nanog mailing list archives

Re: Common operational misconceptions


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 02:04:21 -0800


On Feb 19, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:


In message <201202200107.q1K17W5l000294 () aurora sol net>, Joe Greco writes:
I have running code to make the reverse translations, with
which protocols such as ftp with PORT commands are working.

No, I think you do not understand...

I have a NAT gateway with a single public address.

I have 15 FTP servers and 22 web servers behind it.

I want people to be able to go to ftp://<hostname> and/or =
http://<hostname> for each of them.

Owen,

Your suggestion here would set many "security experts" heads on fire.

Whatever will they do when NAT doesn't make such things virtually
impossible?

:-)

Time to write "How to use SRV with FTP".  CGN is going to push
the extension of a whole lot of protocols.

That would be the worst case scenario, actually.

Owen



Current thread: