nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:58:21 -0800
In a message written on Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 06:33:17PM +0100, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
Most policies can be used in two address families, you can also match prefixes, but you cannot have v4 and v6 prefixes in one term. So in your policies you have to have at least two terms - one for v4 prefixes, one for v6 prefixes.
Another thing IOS-XR fixes! route-policy my-example if destination in my-ipv4-prefix-list or destination in my-ipv6-prefix-list then set community 1234 set med 0 done endif end-policy In 99.99% of the cases it allows you to have one policy for both IPv4 and IPv6, and add the parameter passing I discussed the other day and it's almost like something was thinking of routing engineers when they wrote it. :P -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- IPv6 explicit BGP group configs keith tokash (Feb 08)
- Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs Leo Bicknell (Feb 08)
- Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs Grzegorz Janoszka (Feb 08)
- Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs Leo Bicknell (Feb 08)
- Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs Joel jaeggli (Feb 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs Aleksi Suhonen (Feb 12)
- Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs Owen DeLong (Feb 12)