nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hijacked Network Ranges
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:56:51 +0530
I had this happen to me in 2008 - http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/110097 Total pain in the ass when it does happen. Funnily enough in that case it was another downstream of the same ISP who was pulling this stunt .. --srs On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net> wrote:
The fact that the hijacking ISP's upstreams accepted routes through their network that didn't belong to that ISP is bad enough. That we should still be able to advertise anything without an appropriate filter being in place and expecting it to work (even if it's with good intention, as in this case) is equally as bad.
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Christopher Morrow (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Christopher Morrow (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Alex Band (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges goemon (Feb 05)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges George Bonser (Feb 05)