nanog mailing list archives
Re: Optimal IPv6 router
From: Joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:01:41 -0800
On 2/5/12 17:20 , Glen Kent wrote:
Hi, Most routers today are basically IPv4 routers, with IPv6 thrown in. They are however designed keeping IPv4 in mind. With IPv6 growing, if we were to design a native IPv6 router, with IPv4 functionality thrown in, then is it possible to design a more optimal IPv6 router, than what exists today?
Asic based forwarding engines with ipv6 support are more than a decade old at this point. If one looks at an asr9000 or an MX or T that looks like an ipv6 router to me.
Glen
Current thread:
- Optimal IPv6 router Glen Kent (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Joel jaeggli (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Daniel Roesen (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Leo Bicknell (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Rafael Rodriguez (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Daniel Roesen (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Daniel Roesen (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Glen Kent (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Joel jaeggli (Feb 06)
- RE: Optimal IPv6 router Leigh Porter (Feb 06)