nanog mailing list archives
Re: btw, the itu imploded
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:18:54 +0000
On 19/12/2012 15:17, Tony Finch wrote:
Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:On 19/12/2012 14:25, Tony Finch wrote:Do you have any citations for that? I thought they had given up on trying to interfere with Internet peering and settlement.http://www.itu.int/net/ITU-T/lists/questions.aspx?Group=03&Period=15Looks vaguely ominous. Do they have a document which gives their definition of "international telecommunications services" and "NGNs"?
dunno - they look intentionally vague to me. Nick
Current thread:
- btw, the itu imploded Randy Bush (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded - NOT bmanning (Dec 14)
- RE: btw, the itu imploded Warren Bailey (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Mike A (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Bill Woodcock (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Tony Finch (Dec 19)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Nick Hilliard (Dec 19)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Tony Finch (Dec 19)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Nick Hilliard (Dec 19)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Bill Woodcock (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Tom Taylor (Dec 19)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Gordon Lennox (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Doug Barton (Dec 16)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Phil Regnauld (Dec 16)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Doug Barton (Dec 16)