nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 End User Fee
From: Cutler James R <james.cutler () consultant com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 16:48:51 -0400
On Aug 3, 2012, at 3:22 PM, "Otis L. Surratt, Jr." <otis () ocosa com> wrote:
Anyone charging end users for IPv6 space yet? :p <snip/> Otis
I can't imagine that this would be anything but counterproductive. End users are not interested in IPv6 - most would not recognize IPv6 if it fell out of their screen. End users want working connectivity, not jargon. James R. Cutler james.cutler () consultant com
Current thread:
- IPv6 End User Fee Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Seth Mattinen (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee TJ (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Cutler James R (Aug 03)
- RE: IPv6 End User Fee Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee William Pitcock (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Cutler James R (Aug 03)
- RE: IPv6 End User Fee Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 03)
- RE: IPv6 End User Fee Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Seth Mattinen (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Derek Ivey (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee George Herbert (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Seth Mattinen (Aug 03)