nanog mailing list archives
Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated
From: Blake Hudson <blake () ispn net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:04:06 -0500
I wonder if ATT will be returning some of those /16 and /15 allocations it has in return for the /12 - http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/SIS-80/nets
How does one suddenly justify needing 1,000,000 more IP addresses (explosive expected growth in the next couple months?)
--Blake Owen DeLong wrote the following on 8/23/2012 1:29 AM:
AT&T should just be glad there was a /12 for them to get. That isn't going to be true for much longer. If you are counting on an IPv4 free pool to run your business next year, you are making a bad bet. Owen On Aug 22, 2012, at 22:54 , "Otis L. Surratt, Jr." <otis () ocosa com> wrote:My apologies again, I saw it as 127.0.0.0. and not 172.0.0.0. I've been working long hours last couple nights. Yeah you are probably right, since they to pulled that one very close to RFC1918. http://bgp.potaroo.net/ipv4-stats/allocated-arin.html I would hate to be AT&T for this IP allocation. Heck, I would simple push more IPv6 if I were them. -----Original Message----- From: Dan White [mailto:dwhite () olp net] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 12:37 AM To: Otis L. Surratt, Jr. Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated You can do a whois search at arin.net to see the allocation. 172.0.0.0/12 is often confused with the private 172.16.0.0/12 address space, which I would consider a 'scraping the bottom of the barrel' allocation. I also noticed a couple of subnets in that range showing up in the weekly Cidr reports, beginning in July. On 08/23/12 00:29 -0500, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. wrote:Dan, Can you provide a link to support this? If this is true, I wonder how this will work. Otis -----Original Message----- From: Dan White [mailto:dwhite () olp net] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 12:24 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated 172.0.0.0-172.15.255.255 was allocated on 2012-08-20 to AT&T Internet Services.-- Dan White
Current thread:
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated, (continued)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Willy Wong (Aug 22)
- RE: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated David Miller (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated valdis . kletnieks (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Jimmy Hess (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated joel jaeggli (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Willy Wong (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Dan White (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated George Herbert (Aug 22)
- RE: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Owen DeLong (Aug 22)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Blake Hudson (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Jared Mauch (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Seth Mattinen (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated joel jaeggli (Aug 23)
- RE: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Owen DeLong (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Jeroen van Aart (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated joel jaeggli (Aug 23)
- Re: 172.0.0.0/12 has been Allocated Jeroen van Aart (Aug 23)