RE: IRR-clueful person at 3356?

["Michael Hallgren" <m.hallgren () free fr>]

Yes, usually something like "accept r/n" iff "there is a route object 'covering' r/n and the 'origin AS' of r/n is in 
the AS-set of the neighbor AS.

mh
-----Message d'origine-----
De:Mike Simkins
Envoyé: 17/08/2012, 18:04 
A: jlewis () lewis org; rs () seastrom com
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Objet:Re: IRR-clueful person at 3356?


That's the sort of thing we have in Europe, downstream customer need to be
in your AS-SET for filtering purposes



----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Lewis [mailto:jlewis () lewis org]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 11:29 AM
To: Robert E. Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Cc: nanog () nanog org <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: IRR-clueful person at 3356?

On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:

> The telemetry I'm getting (thirdhand and believed to originate from
> first line support) suggests that both Level(3)'s direct customer and
> any downstreams of that customer need to be in the same IRR component.

Can't say for sure if it's true, but I've been told the same thing by
Level3 support.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
  Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
  Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________