Re: Att funkyness

[virendra rode <virendra.rode () gmail com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

What baffles me is that we have external sources reporting the status
as opposed to the provider. In all fairness there's a list of others
right behind.

Their their status page has been static as a sticky bit & sealed
harder than woodpecker lips.


regards,
/virendra


On 08/16/2012 09:18 AM, Tom Taylor wrote:
> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/081512-atampt-suffers-dns-261673.html?hpg1=bn
>
>
>
>
> Continuing DDOS attack knocked out some DNS servers.
>
> On 15/08/2012 10:46 PM, Phil Dyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Mark Foster 
> > <blakjak () blakjak net> wrote:
> > > Yep. 'no servers could be reached' for at least one domain 
> > > that's hosted with them that i've come across.
> > >
> > > Appears to have been the case for >6 hours as of about 30 
> > > minutes ago, but just retested, fault appears to have cleared.
> >
> >
> > I followed up with this on the outages@ list. Started clearing
> > up for us about 3:30PM EDT. However, I don't see any update from 
> > AT&T. Message has been basically the same all day.
> >
> > http://www.attens.com/customers/outages.shtml
> >
> > phil
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAlAtSmwACgkQ3HuimOHfh+HXfwD+KPpzxz+rHez58vr+5dYNUGBY
kim6QbLhN7c2pHxA1LEBAIxNtvF/nXZcywr2JrTkd7hZm16hRRwTMyeaQ2BONAml
=hhjA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----