nanog mailing list archives
RE: the topic (was: raging bulls)
From: "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund () medline com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 11:41:14 -0500
Thanks for such an intelligent comment that really adds to the discussion. For the record, 1. An article was posted talking about high speed network options. 2. I discussed why they might not be necessary 3. Various comments talked about high speed trading 4. I ended a subject that obviously veered off of networking So yeah "I think" to answer your question. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Sullivan [mailto:asullivan () dyn com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 11:38 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: the topic (was: raging bulls) On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:10:41AM -0500, Naslund, Steve wrote:
We are getting a bit off the NANOG subject
You think? A
Current thread:
- Re: raging bulls, (continued)
- Re: raging bulls joel jaeggli (Aug 08)
- RE: raging bulls Naslund, Steve (Aug 08)
- RE: raging bulls Chu, Yi [NTK] (Aug 11)
- RE: raging bulls Naslund, Steve (Aug 08)
- RE: raging bulls Naslund, Steve (Aug 08)
- Re: raging bulls Brett Frankenberger (Aug 08)
- RE: raging bulls Naslund, Steve (Aug 08)
- Re: raging bulls John Levine (Aug 08)
- RE: raging bulls Naslund, Steve (Aug 08)
- the topic (was: raging bulls) Andrew Sullivan (Aug 08)
- RE: the topic (was: raging bulls) Naslund, Steve (Aug 08)
- Message not available
- RE: raging bulls Naslund, Steve (Aug 08)