nanog mailing list archives

Assymetric routing L3/VZ (FIOS)


From: Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:09:41 -0400


Is anyone else seeing this? DC - DFW back to DC? AFAIK, Verizon-GNI is a customer of L3, so no weird peering issues should be afoot. This adds about 40ms to the R/T time. The path leaving Verizon-GNI (FIOS) goes (seemingly) DC-DC and has lower times (<5ms) unidirectionally.

Tracing the route to pool-173-79-242-218.washdc.fios.verizon.net (173.79.242.218 )

[...]

3 ge-6-16.car1.Baltimore1.Level3.net (4.59.244.85) [AS 65518] 4 msec 0 msec 4 msec 4 ae-11-11.car2.Baltimore1.Level3.net (4.69.134.110) [AS 65518] 0 msec 4 msec 0 msec 5 ae-8-8.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.105) [AS 65518] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
  6 ae-72-72.csw2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.150) [AS 65518] 4 msec
ae-82-82.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.154) [AS 65518] 8 msec 8 msec
  7 ae-61-61.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.129) [AS 65518] 4 msec
    ae-91-91.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.141) [AS 65518] 4 msec
    ae-71-71.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.133) [AS 65518] 4 msec
8 ae-2-2.ebr3.Atlanta2.Level3.net (4.69.132.85) [AS 65518] 16 msec 16 msec 16 msec 9 ae-7-7.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.134.21) [AS 65518] 36 msec 36 msec 36 m sec
 10 ae-73-73.csw2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.145) [AS 65518] 40 msec
ae-63-63.csw1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.133) [AS 65518] 40 msec 40 msec
 11 ae-4-90.edge2.Dallas3.Level3.net (4.69.145.204) [AS 65518] 44 msec
    ae-3-80.edge2.Dallas3.Level3.net (4.69.145.140) [AS 65518] 36 msec
    ae-1-60.edge2.Dallas3.Level3.net (4.69.145.12) [AS 65518] 36 msec
 12 MCI-level3-ae.dallas3.level3.net (4.68.62.34) [AS 65518] 36 msec
    mci-level3-30g.dallas3.level3.net (4.68.62.166) [AS 65518] 36 msec
    MCI-level3-ae.dallas3.level3.net (4.68.62.34) [AS 65518] 36 msec
13 0.ge-0-0-0.DFW01-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (152.63.2.146) [AS 65518] 36 msec 3 6 msec
    0.ae2.DFW01-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net (152.63.2.229) [AS 65518] 36 msec
 14  *  *  *


We're opening a ticket with them, but figured NANOG is an often better place for these resolutions.

Thanks in advance,

Deepak Jain
AiNET
Home of CyberNAP
www.ai.net


Current thread: