nanog mailing list archives
Re: [IPv6] Monitoring BGP IPv6 Sesions
From: chip <chip.gwyn () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:12:01 -0400
There's new mib support in new IOS's and ASR9k stuffs but there's still not feature parity with IPv4. It seems the current prevailing winds indicate less support for SNMP and more for NETCONF. So maybe we should all get cozy with XML rather than OIDs... --chip On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Carlos Asensio <CAsensio () nexica com> wrote:
Hi Nick, Taking your comment into consideration, while we don't have the support for IPv6 on the BGP MIB, I'm afraid we'll have to monitor it "by hand". Best regards, Carlos. -----Mensaje original----- De: Nick Hilliard [mailto:nick () foobar org] Enviado el: jueves, 19 de abril de 2012 10:24 Para: Carlos Asensio CC: nanog () nanog org Asunto: Re: [IPv6] Monitoring BGP IPv6 Sesions On 19/04/2012 09:58, Carlos Asensio wrote:Anyone can help us on that matter?We need BGP4MIBv2. We've needed it for years. I am tired of screen-scraping terminal sessions looking for signs that ipv6 sessions are down or broken. Nick
-- Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc....
Current thread:
- [IPv6] Monitoring BGP IPv6 Sesions Carlos Asensio (Apr 19)
- Re: [IPv6] Monitoring BGP IPv6 Sesions Nick Hilliard (Apr 19)
- Re: [IPv6] Monitoring BGP IPv6 Sesions Sander Steffann (Apr 19)
- RE: [IPv6] Monitoring BGP IPv6 Sesions Carlos Asensio (Apr 19)
- Re: [IPv6] Monitoring BGP IPv6 Sesions chip (Apr 19)
- Re: [IPv6] Monitoring BGP IPv6 Sesions sthaug (Apr 19)
- Re: [IPv6] Monitoring BGP IPv6 Sesions Nick Hilliard (Apr 19)