nanog mailing list archives
Re: Question about peering
From: "Luke S. Crawford" <lsc () prgmr com>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 18:35:15 -0400
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 06:16:30PM -0400, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Sometimes making the AS path as short as possible makes a lot of sense (e.g. when trying to get an anycast network to do the right thing), but assumptions that peering results in lower costs are less true every day.
I keep reading people say that. But wouldn't the same forces that push down the per-megabit cost of transit also push down the per-megabit cost of peering?
Current thread:
- Question about peering Anurag Bhatia (Apr 06)
- Re: Question about peering Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 06)
- Re: Question about peering Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 07)
- Re: Question about peering Luke S. Crawford (Apr 07)
- Re: Question about peering Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 07)
- Re: Question about peering Luke S. Crawford (Apr 07)
- Re: Question about peering Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 07)
- Re: Question about peering Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 07)
- Re: Question about peering Randy Bush (Apr 07)
- Re: Question about peering Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 06)
- Re: Question about peering Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Question about peering Joel M Snyder (Apr 07)