nanog mailing list archives
Re: "general badness" AS-based reputation system
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:56:54 +0300
We tried to outline some of the challenges of building such a system in our NANOG52 presentation: http://www.merit.edu/networkresearch/papers/pdf/2011/NANOG52_reputation-nanog.pdf In particular see slide 4. where we tried to lay down what we think the requirements are for a socially acceptable reputation system. With a bit of luck we might be able to announce the release of our system before the next NANOG mtg, but in my opinion collating host reputation reports is just a small and the easiest part of the effort. The key is in solving the challenges of allowing (and incentivizing) participation and being robust to false information injection.
I've actually encountered a system that was accepted for operational use once. Bad data was added at some point (bound to happen) and the system was shut down.
Thanks for sharing your slides, keep up the good work! Gadi.
Current thread:
- "general badness" AS-based reputation system Gadi Evron (Sep 25)
- Re: "general badness" AS-based reputation system Jimmy Hess (Sep 25)
- Re: "general badness" AS-based reputation system Gadi Evron (Sep 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: "general badness" AS-based reputation system Manish Karir (Sep 25)
- Re: "general badness" AS-based reputation system Tom Vest (Sep 25)
- Re: "general badness" AS-based reputation system Manish Karir (Sep 25)
- Re: "general badness" AS-based reputation system Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 25)
- Re: "general badness" AS-based reputation system Tom Vest (Sep 26)
- Re: "general badness" AS-based reputation system Tom Vest (Sep 25)
- Re: "general badness" AS-based reputation system Gadi Evron (Sep 26)
- Re: "general badness" AS-based reputation system Serranos (Sep 28)
- Re: "general badness" AS-based reputation system Jimmy Hess (Sep 25)