nanog mailing list archives

Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing


From: PC <paul4004 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:54:56 -0600

An optimal solution would be a tiered system where the adjusted price only
applies to traffic units over the price tier threshold and not retroactively
to all traffic units.

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Brandon Galbraith <
brandon.galbraith () gmail com> wrote:

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net
wrote:


If you have a lot more, you can negotiate tiers.  E.g. The first 10G is
$X/Mbps, but if you hit 20G, you get charged 20000 * $Y (where Y < X,
obviously).  This can lead to interesting situations where 19 Gbps costs
more than 20 Gbps.  But dems da breaks.

--
TTFN,
patrick


I knew of a place that used to push "fake" traffic over a link to ensure
they were in the cheaper (higher) tier. Who knew business rules overriding
engineering could result in non-optimal situations.

--
Brandon Galbraith
US Voice: 630.492.0464



Current thread: