nanog mailing list archives
Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing
From: PC <paul4004 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:54:56 -0600
An optimal solution would be a tiered system where the adjusted price only applies to traffic units over the price tier threshold and not retroactively to all traffic units. On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Brandon Galbraith < brandon.galbraith () gmail com> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai netwrote:If you have a lot more, you can negotiate tiers. E.g. The first 10G is $X/Mbps, but if you hit 20G, you get charged 20000 * $Y (where Y < X, obviously). This can lead to interesting situations where 19 Gbps costs more than 20 Gbps. But dems da breaks. -- TTFN, patrickI knew of a place that used to push "fake" traffic over a link to ensure they were in the cheaper (higher) tier. Who knew business rules overriding engineering could result in non-optimal situations. -- Brandon Galbraith US Voice: 630.492.0464
Current thread:
- Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Pradeep Bangera (Sep 21)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 21)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Brandon Galbraith (Sep 21)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing PC (Sep 21)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 21)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing PC (Sep 22)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Ryan Malayter (Sep 22)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing fredrik danerklint (Sep 22)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Matthew Palmer (Sep 22)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Brandon Galbraith (Sep 21)
- Re: Question on 95th percentile and Over-usage transit pricing Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 21)