nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling
From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz () forthnet gr>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:49:17 +0300
Strangely, both the RFC (5396) and the CIDR report appear to be written by the same guy...Geoff.
btw, am i the only one who finds it easier to remember asdot formatted ASNs? - Tassos Nick Hilliard wrote on 16/9/2011 23:06:
On 16/09/2011 00:51, Schiller, Heather A wrote:I thought AS-plain notation was the standard for 4-byte ASN's?Wasn't there an RFC written about this by some australian bloke? I'd say that whoever maintains the CIDR report these days should really take a couple of minutes to clue themselves in about asplain syntax. Nick
Current thread:
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Sep 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Sep 09)
- RE: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Schiller, Heather A (Sep 15)
- Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
- Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Daniel Roesen (Sep 16)
- Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
- RE: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Schiller, Heather A (Sep 15)
- Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Nick Hilliard (Sep 16)
- Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Sep 16)
- Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
- Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Joe Hamelin (Sep 16)