Re: what about the users re: NAT444 or ?

[Christian de Larrinaga <cdel () firsthand net>]

exactly. don't plan to deploy what breaks things for the user edge. 

there are two issues here 

1/ what ISPs do that might break things at the edge

2/ what edge stuff is doing that will break things at the other end edge of a connection


It seems a bit odd that ISPs would actively plot to do 1/ whilst they could be making hard cash helping people at the 
edge avoid 2/

Odd because it adds a 3/ element which is stuff at the edge which will break stuff in the network. Do (some) operators 
see more money in a 1/2/3/ world?



Christian
On 8 Sep 2011, at 17:52, Dan Wing wrote:

> > Is there not a bit of CPE needed here? What should the CPE do? and not
> > do? should it deprecate NAT/PAT when it receives 1918 allocation from a
> > CGN?
>
> Careful with that idea -- people like their in-home network to continue
> functioning even when their ISP is down or having an outage.