nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cidr Report
From: Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:12:33 +0500
I seriously don't understand that why an RIR can't send atleast a notice to those announcing bogus prefixes. A letter in RED mailed to the business address would help.RIRs claimed in the past that they have nothing to do with routing. of course, rpki-based origin validation changes this. but i suspect that they may still want to keep as distant as possible.
well IMHO, that's "stealing of resource." Yes if they have nothing to do with routing than atleast they should do somethin to safe guard what they are providing to thr members. So, any chance of putting a banner of top polluters in next APRICOT. :) -- Regards, Aftab A. Siddiqui
Current thread:
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Joelja () bogus com (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Oct 15)
- Re: The Cidr Report Aftab Siddiqui (Oct 16)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: The Cidr Report Aftab Siddiqui (Oct 16)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: The Cidr Report Aftab Siddiqui (Oct 16)
- Re: The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: The Cidr Report Aftab Siddiqui (Oct 16)
- Re: The Cidr Report William F. Maton Sotomayor (Oct 16)
- Re: The Cidr Report Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 16)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Oct 15)
- Re: The Cidr Report Hank Nussbacher (Oct 16)