Re: Please change Mailman back to NOT force the rewrite for Reply-to

["Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>]

On Oct 15, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> John Peach (john-nanog) writes:
> > > Normally I'd have just made this point privately, and perhaps only on 
> > > Futures, but since it seems to be a recent change, I'm doing the public 
> > > service of pointing it out, while asking that it be adjusted back.
> >
> > I don't see that; I have to specifically choose to reply to the list.
> > Maybe someone, like me, sets their own reply-to to the list.
>
>       From the headers.
>
>       X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
>       Precedence: list
>       Reply-To: nanog () nanog org
>       List-Id: North American Network Operators Group <nanog.nanog.org>
>
>       Mutt asks me, but other mailers might not.

Yes, he said he set reply-to  himself.  Look at your own post, it has no such header.

-- 
TTFN,
patrick