nanog mailing list archives
Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities
From: Matt Hite <lists () beatmixed com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:14:37 -0700
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Tom Lanyon <tom+nanog () oneshoeco com> wrote:
Finally - are there any reasons to avoid running next-hop-self on ibgp sessions? The upside is we get to avoid distributing all of our transit/peer upstream point to point links into the rest of the network. Again, I understand this may be undesirable from a SP perspective, but when our 'clients' are all a bunch of internal servers it makes sense to keep iBGP/IGP as clean as possible...
Route reflectors in the mix? Next-hop-self not so useful there... -M
Current thread:
- SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Tom Lanyon (Oct 10)
- Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Matt Hite (Oct 10)
- Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Keegan Holley (Oct 10)
- Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Christopher Morrow (Oct 10)
- Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Keegan Holley (Oct 10)
- Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Christopher Morrow (Oct 10)
- Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Christopher Morrow (Oct 10)
- Re: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Oct 11)