nanog mailing list archives
Re: Link local for P-t-P links? (Was: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?)
From: Mike Jones <mike () mikejones in>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 02:40:16 +0000
On 1 December 2011 02:22, Ray Soucy <rps () maine edu> wrote:
I for one get really irritated when my traceroutes and pings are broken and I need to troubleshoot things. ;-) But I guess something has to give.
My home connection gets IPv6 connectivity via a tunnelbroker tunnel, i didn't use the "tunnel interface" addresses in the instructions but configured it without addresses, traceroutes (in all directions) show up with the routers single assigned global address. Routers would still have a single global address assigned to loopback (or anywhere) for management/packet generation purposes so traceroutes should work fine, although rather than getting a per-interface address you'll get a per-router address. What addresses do you currently get in the real world? some routers give a loopback address, some give the ingress interface, some give the egress interface, all you can safely assume from the address is the router it hit. - Mike
Current thread:
- Link local for P-t-P links? (Was: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?) Mike Jones (Nov 30)
- Re: Link local for P-t-P links? (Was: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?) Ray Soucy (Nov 30)
- Re: Link local for P-t-P links? (Was: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?) Mike Jones (Nov 30)
- RE: Link local for P-t-P links? (Was: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?) McCall, Gabriel (Nov 30)
- Re: Link local for P-t-P links? (Was: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?) Ray Soucy (Nov 30)