Re: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

On Nov 29, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:

> On 11/29/11 09:30 , Owen DeLong wrote:
> > I believe those have been obsoleted, but, /64 remains the best choice, IMHO.
>
> operational practice has moved on.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6164

RFC 6164 does not say anything bad about using /64.

Owen

> > Owen
> >
> > On Nov 29, 2011, at 9:00 AM, McCall, Gabriel wrote:
> >
> > > Note that /127 is strongly discouraged in RFC5375 and RFC3627. 3627 suggests using /112 for router links, or /126 
> > > at the very most.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred () cisco com] 
> > > ...
> > > I see no reason you couldn't use a /127 prefix if the link was point to point.
> > > ...