nanog mailing list archives

Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation


From: Ray Soucy <rps () maine edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:51:51 -0500

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:36 AM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
A number of providers seem to be doing just fine with that business model over> on the IPv4 side of the fence.  And 
since they're usually a near-monopoly in> their service area, angry customers aren't likely to actually vote with 
their> wallets.  Why is there any expectation that it will be any different in the> IPv6 world?
This.

My options for home are Time Warner Cable 15M down, 1M up; or
Fairpoint DSL, 3M down, 128K up.

So my option is really only TWC.

And I live 3 miles off the University of Maine campus.  Other parts of
the state don't have the luxury of more than one option, if any.

You can't vote with your wallet if you're stuck with a monopoly.

-- 
Ray Soucy

Epic Communications Specialist

Phone: +1 (207) 561-3526

Networkmaine, a Unit of the University of Maine System
http://www.networkmaine.net/


Current thread: