nanog mailing list archives
Re: economic value of low AS numbers
From: Jim Mercer <jim () reptiles org>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:58:37 -0500
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:21:59AM -0800, David Conrad wrote:
On Nov 17, 2011, at 8:16 AM, Keegan Holley wrote:Besides standing at the water cooler at 1:23PM on 12/3 telling AS123 jokes I'm not sure a particular AS number has any relevance or any monetary value unless there is scarcity.You are discounting (pun intended) vanity and marketing. I am no longer surprised at what people will be willing to pay (sometimes astonishing amounts of) money for.
UAE license plate auctions, "1" sold for $14 million http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aJ8EZTdrItjs Lebanon phone number auction, 71-444444 went for $68,000 http://www.ameinfo.com/207677.html -- [ Jim Mercer Reptilian Research jim () reptiles org +1 416 410-5633 ] [ stressed spelled backwards is desserts. ] [ coincidence? i think not. ]
Current thread:
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers, (continued)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jay Ashworth (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jeffrey Ollie (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jeffrey Ollie (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Robert Bonomi (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jay Ashworth (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Dave Hart (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Keegan Holley (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 17)
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Jim Mercer (Nov 17)
- Message not available
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Owen DeLong (Nov 17)
- Message not available
- Re: economic value of low AS numbers Owen DeLong (Nov 17)