nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP conf
From: Edward avanti <edward.avanti () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:50:59 +1000
Halo, sorry, my english not so perfect, at no time I mean send to IX what Verizon send me, I'm not THAT stupid hehe I mean if destination/origin is via IX, then send THAT traffic only by IX and not Verizon. On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Holmes,David A <dholmes () mwdh2o com> wrote:
This is a perfect example of why it is crucial that inbound route filters be scrupulously maintained in upstream BGP providers. Who knows who is out there. -----Original Message----- From: McCall, Gabriel [mailto:Gabriel.McCall () thyssenkrupp com] Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 7:29 PM To: Edward avanti; nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: BGP conf Google for "team cymru secure bgp template" for a good starting point. -----Original message----- From: Edward avanti <edward.avanti () gmail com> To: "nanog () nanog org" <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Wed, Nov 2, 2011 01:01:37 GMT+00:00 Subject: BGP conf Halo, First, I accept this might not really right list for request, have use nsp cisco list but only first post to was succeed, sent several other for past 4 day and none appear (verified by list archive) so please excuse request. I am in need of a cisco config for BGP setup, we have a require to include IX peering at new location as well as our Verizon link, we like to take full bgp from Verizon and send to IX what they send us, I spend days reading google, and so many conflict web site example, so many example seem insecure no prefix list so on. end result to date is only sore eyes, would someone who do same (not need be Verizon) be kind to send us off list working running config (yes without your password heh) or at least how to apply to BGP router including access/prefix list and interfaces so we have an idea on what do, if you take two full BGP feed from two transit carrierin load share and IX, that good, because that our stage three plan, but I can work without two transit. I am not ignorant with cisco 7201, but am total newby to BGP. Best Thanks Edwardo This communication, together with any attachments or embedded links, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail message and delete the original and all copies of the communication, along with any attachments or embedded links, from your system.
Current thread:
- BGP conf Edward avanti (Nov 01)
- Re: BGP conf Mark Gauvin (Nov 01)
- Re: BGP conf Edward avanti (Nov 01)
- Re: BGP conf Jeff Wheeler (Nov 01)
- Re: BGP conf McCall, Gabriel (Nov 01)
- RE: BGP conf Holmes,David A (Nov 02)
- Re: BGP conf Edward avanti (Nov 02)
- Re: BGP conf Jeff Wheeler (Nov 02)
- Re: BGP conf Jack Bates (Nov 02)
- Re: BGP conf Jeff Wheeler (Nov 02)
- Re: BGP conf Jack Bates (Nov 02)
- Re: BGP conf Jeff Wheeler (Nov 02)
- Re: BGP conf Jeff Kell (Nov 02)
- RE: BGP conf Holmes,David A (Nov 02)
- Re: BGP conf Mark Gauvin (Nov 01)
- RE: BGP conf Larry May (Nov 02)