nanog mailing list archives
Re: Arguing against using public IP space
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:43:32 -0500
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 19:14:59 CST, Brett Frankenberger said:
What if you air-gap the SCADA network of which you are in administrative control, and then there's a failure on it, and the people responsible for troubleshooting it can't do it remotely (because of the air gap), so the trouble continues for an extra hour while they drive to the office, and that extra hour of failure causes someone to die. Should that result in a homicide charge?
If you designed a life-critical airgapped network that didn't have a trained warm body at the NOC 24/7 with an airgapped management console, and hot (or at least warm) spares for both console and console monkey, yes, you *do* deserve that negligent homicide charge.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Arguing against using public IP space, (continued)
- Re: Arguing against using public IP space Dobbins, Roland (Nov 13)
- Re: Arguing against using public IP space Jay Ashworth (Nov 13)
- Re: Arguing against using public IP space Dobbins, Roland (Nov 13)
- Re: Arguing against using public IP space Brett Frankenberger (Nov 13)
- Re: Arguing against using public IP space Jay Ashworth (Nov 13)
- Re: Arguing against using public IP space Joe Greco (Nov 13)
- Re: Arguing against using public IP space Joel jaeggli (Nov 13)
- Re: Arguing against using public IP space Joe Greco (Nov 14)
- Re: Arguing against using public IP space Dobbins, Roland (Nov 13)
- Re: Arguing against using public IP space Joe Greco (Nov 14)
- Re: Arguing against using public IP space Jay Ashworth (Nov 13)
- Re: Arguing against using public IP space Dobbins, Roland (Nov 13)
- Re: Arguing against using public IP space Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 13)
- Re: Arguing against using public IP space Jason Lewis (Nov 13)