nanog mailing list archives
Re: [outages] More notes
From: brian nikell <nickellman () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 20:37:55 -0700
Actually, Juniper does disclose code bugs. Though not always to the public at first, importantly to Juniper customers. Juniper had advised all of their customers last August of this bug, however Level3 chose to continue running it on their peer routers. Thus if Level3 and its clue(full) management might have listened to their operators & network engineers.... cheers On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----From: "Jonathan Lassoff" <jof () thejof com><tangential sidenote> It's too bad that Junipers bugs aren't listed publicly. For clueful network operations, having this information available to them could have enabled them to properly weigh the risk of evaluating and certifying versions of their operating systems.The reason it's called "gambling" is that sometimes, you lose. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
-- -B
Current thread:
- Re: [outages] More notes Jay Ashworth (Nov 07)
- Re: [outages] More notes brian nikell (Nov 07)
- Re: [outages] More notes Stephane Bortzmeyer (Nov 08)
- Re: [outages] More notes Bjørn Mork (Nov 08)
- Re: [outages] More notes Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 08)
- Re: [outages] More notes Jack Bates (Nov 08)
- Re: [outages] More notes Stephane Bortzmeyer (Nov 08)
- Re: [outages] More notes brian nikell (Nov 07)