nanog mailing list archives

Re: Routing study


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 14:45:24 -0700

My guess would be that someone didn't get the memo about the use agreement
ending since they apparently still were listed in whois.

Just a thought. Might have been a legitimate mistake from a position of ignorance,
not knowing that they weren't still the registered resource holder.

Owen

On May 13, 2011, at 2:22 PM, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:


their use agreement ended in 2008.  telling the nanog world they are going to reuse it
three years later is not exactly what most would consider prior notice to the registered
holder that they would like to do a research project wiht resources that are not registered
to them.

/bill


On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:02:55PM -0400, Greg Whynott wrote:
On May 12, 2011, at 6:30 AM, <bmanning () vacation karoshi com> <bmanning () vacation karoshi com> wrote:

erb
d I would appreciate it if they
would at least notify me ahead of time if they want to futz around
with prefixes that are not registered to them.


erb

helps to read before you jump!

-g


--

This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the 
intended recipient. Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. 
Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this message may not be that of the organization.



Current thread: