nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 foot-dragging
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen () mompl net>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 12:16:37 -0700
Joe Loiacono wrote:
Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org> wrote on 05/12/2011 09:19:21 AM:On 2011-May-12 15:14, Joe Loiacono wrote:Anyone know roughly the current default-free routing table size forIPv6?http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/status/Awesome web-site. The world of IPv6 routing on one page.
That is a great overview.And really, if a conservative institution such as the *catholic church* jumped on the IPv6 bandwagon there is really NO excuse for other companies to drag their heels, for crying out loud. ;-)
http://www.sixxs.net/tools/whois/?AS8978 Greetings, Jeroen -- http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/ http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 foot-dragging, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 foot-dragging George Bonser (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Martin Millnert (May 12)
- RE: IPv6 foot-dragging George Bonser (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Owen DeLong (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jimmy Hess (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jeff Wheeler (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Matthew Petach (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Joe Loiacono (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jeroen van Aart (May 13)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Bernhard Schmidt (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Joel Maslak (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Jeroen van Aart (May 12)
- Re: IPv6 foot-dragging Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 12)