nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interested in input on tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology
From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 08:26:17 +0100 (BST)
would be interested to know what people think is good about tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology, and what people think is bad about tunnels.
The good thing about tunnels is people can build them where there's no proper network The bad thing about tunnels is people build them instead of a proper network brandon
Current thread:
- Interested in input on tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology Karl Auer (May 12)
- Re: Interested in input on tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 13)
- RE: Interested in input on tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology Tony Hain (May 13)
- Re: Interested in input on tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology Mark Andrews (May 15)
- Re: Interested in input on tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology Cameron Byrne (May 13)
- Re: Interested in input on tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology TR Shaw (May 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Interested in input on tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology Brandon Butterworth (May 13)
- Re: Interested in input on tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology Randy Bush (May 13)
- Re: Interested in input on tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology Blake Hudson (May 13)