nanog mailing list archives
RE: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet
From: "George Bonser" <gbonser () seven com>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 14:28:47 -0700
But do you really believe playboy are going to give up playboy.com?
They aren't going to give up Playboy.com but they are probably going to have to purchase playboy.xxx anyway. What bothers me is that most companies are now going to be forced to purchase .xxx domains simply to keep someone else from buying it and sullying the company's image. So it is an instant cash windfall for the domain registrars. There was no reason why we needed this.
Current thread:
- Re: not really ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet, (continued)
- Re: not really ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet John Levine (Mar 27)
- Re: not really ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Eric Brunner-Williams (Mar 27)
- Re: not really ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet John R. Levine (Mar 27)
- Re: not really ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Eric Brunner-Williams (Mar 27)
- Re: not really ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet John R. Levine (Mar 27)
- Re: not really ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Tony Finch (Mar 29)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Barry Shein (Mar 27)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Donald Eastlake (Mar 27)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet William Herrin (Mar 27)
- RE: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet George Bonser (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Marshall Eubanks (Mar 26)
- RE: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Stefan Fouant (Mar 26)
- Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet Mans Nilsson (Mar 26)