nanog mailing list archives
Re: L3DSR server side bits open sourced
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:37:40 +0900
:: a real use for the diffserv bits! why not flowlabel in 6? it's been :: looking for a use for a decade. Honestly, we figured flowlabel might actually find a use before all the values of diffserv will :) In all seriousness, we are starting to set the spec for v6 l3dsr now, so, if you care, and believe that flowlabel would be a better field to "hijack" (or have a suggestion for another, better way then same DSCP methodology that we used for ipv4), we welcome input..
well, compared to an extension header, it wins hands down. randy
Current thread:
- L3DSR server side bits open sourced Jan Schaumann (Mar 08)
- Re: L3DSR server side bits open sourced Randy Bush (Mar 08)
- Re: L3DSR server side bits open sourced Christopher Morrow (Mar 08)
- Re: L3DSR server side bits open sourced Randy Bush (Mar 08)
- Re: L3DSR server side bits open sourced Igor Gashinsky (Mar 08)
- Re: L3DSR server side bits open sourced Randy Bush (Mar 08)
- Re: L3DSR server side bits open sourced Shane Amante (Mar 09)
- Re: L3DSR server side bits open sourced Igor Gashinsky (Mar 09)
- Re: L3DSR server side bits open sourced Christopher Morrow (Mar 08)
- Re: L3DSR server side bits open sourced Randy Bush (Mar 08)