nanog mailing list archives

Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6


From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:47:30 +1000


In message <AB27763F-4858-4E70-9825-C3093D8F1416 () delong com>, Owen DeLong write
s:

On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:

In a message written on Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:22:12AM -0500, Jima wrote:
Oh, oops; you did touch upon this.  You might want to let the people 
who've implemented RDNSS in software know that the IETF is working on 
it.  I'm sure that'll be a relief.

Maybe I'm missing something, but the last update on this was RFC
5006 I think, which is marked as "experimental", and I thought the
IETF still had a working group discussing it. 

That is, I didn't think it was a finalized standard yet.

-- 
      Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440
       PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/

Many of the most widely used technologies on the internet do not become
finalized standards at the IETF level until long after they have been in
widespread use.

Owen

But very few are "experimental" and stay that way.  Many stay at
"proposed standard".

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: