nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 15:40:52 +0100 (BST)
The original organizers of W6D have zero motivation to try such a thing and I can't imagine why they would even consider it for more than a picosecond.
This W6D is about turning v6 on. At some point, many years from now, when everyone has got bored of supporting legacy v4 for a hand full of legacy users there might be a v6 only day where we turn v4 off to test if it can be generally ceased. brandon
Current thread:
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Brandon Butterworth (Jun 04)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Jimmy Hess (Jun 04)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 04)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Gregory Edigarov (Jun 06)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 04)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Jimmy Hess (Jun 04)