nanog mailing list archives
IPv6 Week (was Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet?)
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:45:19 -0400
My thoughts are that we need either a week or a 36-48 hour period. I thought this before the events of last week. I am very happy with the results and that based on the public statements so far (Looking forward to hearing what is presented at NANOG on this as well) that it was viewed as "didn't break much" by the major players. This affirms to me what we've observed for many years. Having IPv6 enabled doesn't break "much", and not in a way that is any more broken by the issues you can observe in networks otherwise. - Jared On Jun 10, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Bill Stewart wrote:
So should monthly IPv6 day be the same week as Microsoft Patch Tuesday? :-)
Current thread:
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet?, (continued)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Jimmy Hess (Jun 19)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Mark Andrews (Jun 19)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Tony Finch (Jun 20)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Mark Andrews (Jun 20)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- RE: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Dennis Burgess (Jun 08)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Jay Ashworth (Jun 08)
- Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet? Bill Stewart (Jun 10)
- IPv6 Week (was Re: So... is it time to do IPv6 day monthy yet?) Jared Mauch (Jun 10)