nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 routing protocols
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:27:24 +0200
On 10 jun 2011, at 12:20, Nick Hilliard wrote: [nothing to support his earlier claim]
And it still carries link local next hop addresses.
it's a bit more subtle than that - it depends on how the underlying router operating system handles next-hop resolution and how you configure your BGP.
It doesn't depend. RFC 4760: An UPDATE message that carries the MP_REACH_NLRI MUST also carry the ORIGIN and the AS_PATH attributes (both in EBGP and in IBGP exchanges). Moreover, in IBGP exchanges such a message MUST also carry the LOCAL_PREF attribute.
Current thread:
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6, (continued)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 14)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 14)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 16)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Matt Addison (Jun 14)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 William Herrin (Jun 10)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Nick Hilliard (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Ray Soucy (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Nick Hilliard (Jun 09)
- IPv6 routing protocols Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Nick Hilliard (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Nick Hilliard (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Owen DeLong (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Xiaoliang Zhao (Jun 10)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Ray Soucy (Jun 09)