nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent IPv6
From: Chuck Anderson <cra () WPI EDU>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:09:23 -0400
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 01:32:58AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
IPv6 netmasks work exactly like IPv4 netmasks. You can even route /128's if you want. Two major caveats: 1. SLAAC (stateless autoconfiguration, the more or less replacement for DHCP) only works if the subnet on your LAN is exactly /64. So unless you're manually configuring the IPv6 address on every machine on your subnet, you're using a /64.You can actually use DHCPv6 to assign addresses to hosts dynamically on longer than /64 networks. However, you may have to go to some effort to add DHCPv6 support to those hosts first.
Also, there is no prefix-length (or default router) option in DHCPv6, so you have to configure the Router Advertisements with the longer prefix length in this case.
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent IPv6, (continued)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Jack Bates (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 William Herrin (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Jack Bates (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Joel Jaeggli (Jun 09)
- RE: Cogent IPv6 George Bonser (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Chuck Anderson (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Rob Evans (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Grzegorz Janoszka (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 sthaug (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Chuck Anderson (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 sthaug (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Ray Soucy (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Nick Hilliard (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Ray Soucy (Jun 09)
- The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 sthaug (Jun 10)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
- Message not available
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Tim Chown (Jun 10)
- Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)