nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent IPv6
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:51:38 -0700
On Jun 8, 2011, at 7:18 AM, ryan () u13 net wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:51:21 -0400, Nick Olsen wrote:I'm sure someone here is doing IPv6 peering with cogent. We've got a Gig with them, So they don't do that dual peering thing with us. (They do it on another 100Mb/s circuit we have... I despise it.) Just kind of curious how they go about it. Do they issue you a small IPv6 block for your interface, just like they do for IPv4? Is it a separate session? Any things to be aware of before pulling the trigger on it? (Other then them not having connectivity to HE's IPv6 side of things, Wish they would fix that already...) Nick Olsen Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106We have separate v4 and v6 sessions with them on the same dual-stack interface (a v4 /29 and v6 /112 on the interface). One session is between our v4 address and theirs, and carries v4 prefixes only. Then another session between v6 addresses that carries v6 prefixes only.
That's really the best way to do dual stack peering anyway. Keeps things much cleaner. Owen
Current thread:
- Cogent IPv6 Nick Olsen (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Mark Radabaugh (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Martin Millnert (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 ryan (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent IPv6 Kelly Setzer (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 William Herrin (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Chris Adams (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Aftab Siddiqui (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Jack Bates (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 William Herrin (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Jack Bates (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Joel Jaeggli (Jun 09)
- RE: Cogent IPv6 George Bonser (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Chuck Anderson (Jun 09)