nanog mailing list archives

Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 41, Issue 153


From: Mickey Fox <mike () cmkconsulting com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:05:19 -0500

Failure to sync = dirty power and a horribly corrupted sine wave. A bit more
than watching an old microwave.

On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:00 AM, <nanog-request () nanog org> wrote:

Send NANOG mailing list submissions to
       nanog () nanog org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
       https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
       nanog-request () nanog org

You can reach the person managing the list at
       nanog-owner () nanog org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of NANOG digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Wacky Weekend: NERC to relax power grid frequency strictures
     (Jay Ashworth)
  2. Re: Wacky Weekend: NERC to relax power grid frequency
     strictures (Jussi Peltola)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:29:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Subject: Wacky Weekend: NERC to relax power grid frequency strictures
To: NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Message-ID:
       <23981692.56.1308954554440.JavaMail.root () benjamin baylink com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

The North American Electric Reliability Council is planning to relax
the standards for how closely power utilities must hold to 60.00Hz.

Here's my absolute favorite quote of all time:

 Tweaking the power grid's frequency is expensive and takes a lot of
effort,
 said Joe McClelland, head of electric reliability for the Federal Energy
 Regulatory Commission.

 "Is anyone using the grid to keep track of time?" McClelland said. "Let's
see
 if anyone complains if we eliminate it."


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SCI_POWER_CLOCKS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

I believe the answer to that question is contained here:

 http://yarchive.net/car/rv/generator_synchronization.html [1]

This is gonna be fun, no?

Cheers,
-- jra
[1]Please, let's not start in on the source.[2]
[2]No, really: *please*.  :-)
--
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink
jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC
2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover
DII
St Petersburg FL USA      http://photo.imageinc.us             +1 727 647
1274



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 07:32:41 +0300
From: Jussi Peltola <pelzi () pelzi net>
Subject: Re: Wacky Weekend: NERC to relax power grid frequency
       strictures
To: nanog () nanog org
Message-ID: <20110625043241.GF25848 () pokute pelzi net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 06:29:14PM -0400, Jay Ashworth wrote:
This is gonna be fun, no?

If your definition of fun is spending a year watching an old microwave
clock lose or gain a few minutes.

I don't see how this has anything to do with syncing two generators. The
grid is in sync, and if the frequency of the grid changes (as it does
all the time) it will stay in sync. It has nothing to do with the
absolute frequency.



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
NANOG () nanog org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog

End of NANOG Digest, Vol 41, Issue 153
**************************************



Current thread: