Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers

[Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com>]

On Jul 26, 2011 7:58 AM, "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <jordi.palet () consulintel es>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I will like to know, from those deploying IPv6 services to residential
> customers, if you are planning to provide static or dynamic IPv6 prefixes.
>
> Just to be clear, I'm for static prefix delegation to residential
> customers, however I heard that some ISPs are doing dynamic delegations,
> the same way as is common today with IPv4.
>
> I don't thin it make sense, as the main reason for doing so in IPv4 was
> address exhaustion and legacy oversubscription models such as PPP/dial-up.

In mobile, v6 addresses will be dynamic with no persistence across link
state changes.

Cb

> Regards,
> Jordi
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.consulintel.es
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, including attached files, is prohibited.
>