nanog mailing list archives
RE: [c-nsp] Is Performance Routing, PfR a dead duck?
From: "Eric Hileman" <nanog () magemojo com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:32:55 -0400
Thanks! You saw it in use in the context in which I was speaking, correct? Isn't PfR the latest iteration of OER?
It's not dead and I've actually seen it in use a couple of times. Look up OER. I believe Dana Blair was/is the principle engineer. tv _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp () puck nether net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _____ NANOG mailing list NANOG () nanog org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
Current thread:
- RE: [c-nsp] Is Performance Routing, PfR a dead duck? Eric Hileman (Jul 24)
- Re: [c-nsp] Is Performance Routing, PfR a dead duck? Tony Varriale (Jul 24)
- RE: [c-nsp] Is Performance Routing, PfR a dead duck? Eric Hileman (Jul 24)
- RE: [c-nsp] Is Performance Routing, PfR a dead duck? Frank Bulk (Jul 28)
- RE: [c-nsp] Is Performance Routing, PfR a dead duck? Eric Hileman (Jul 24)
- Re: [c-nsp] Is Performance Routing, PfR a dead duck? Tony Varriale (Jul 24)