nanog mailing list archives
Re: 32 and directallocate
From: Chris Hills <chaz () chaz6 com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:27:53 +0100
On 19/07/2011 03:43, Brielle Bruns wrote:
On 7/18/11 7:02 PM, Deric Kwok wrote:Hi I have the following questions. hope you can help 1/ In ipv6 /32. ls it same as ipv4 /32No.
It depends how you define it. If you mean the number of bits in the network mask, then yes it is the same. If it is the size of the network, then it is not the same. _____ NANOG mailing list NANOG () nanog org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
Current thread:
- 32 and directallocate Deric Kwok (Jul 18)
- Re: 32 and directallocate Brielle Bruns (Jul 18)
- Re: 32 and directallocate Chris Hills (Jul 23)
- Re: 32 and directallocate Brielle Bruns (Jul 18)