Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward

[Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>]

On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Larry J. Blunk wrote:
>  I've have some concerns with AMS based on my experience
> with the IETF mailing list.  It has had ongoing issues with
> out-of-sequence delivery.  Based on the Received headers, it's
> seems pretty clear the re-ordering is occurring internal to the
> AMS servers.  It appears they may be trying something different
> with the NANOG list as the IETF list does not employ bulk_mailer.

ietf.org is mailman and postfix.

> -Larry