nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 23:59:15 +0900
Thankfully, the current test has been a success. We are going to stay inHooray for testing in production.
we are not dealing with stupid or inexperienced people here. i assume they tested. but, like our beloved vendors, they also have a hard time reproducing the real network in the lab, so we end up debugging it for them. otoh, i am willing to wager that in a few weeks, we will not see bugs in the list. sure can't say the same for the vendors. randy
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward?, (continued)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward? XPhi (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Mattias Ahnberg (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Mattias Ahnberg (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Richard Kulawiec (Jul 13)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Ben McGinnes (Jul 14)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Alex Ryu (Jul 14)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Ben McGinnes (Jul 14)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Richard Kulawiec (Jul 13)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Jay Ashworth (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Randy Bush (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Paul Ferguson (Jul 12)
- RE: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Ralph E. Whitmore, III (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward -Hammer- (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Jimmy Hess (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward -Hammer- (Jul 13)