nanog mailing list archives
Re: 2010 IPv4 (and IPv6) Address Use Report
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:23:00 -0500
Certainly not. I was thinking more if people wanted something to pass on to management, marketing, mother, etc.... --Richard On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com> wrote:
On 4 jan 2011, at 17:30, Richard Barnes wrote:Also, for a slightly more average-person-friendly view, see Iljitsch's article in Ars Technica: <http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/01/2010-in-ip-addresses-225-million-down-496-million-to-go.ars>I would never dare call NANOG members average. :-) Iljitsch
Current thread:
- 2010 IPv4 (and IPv6) Address Use Report Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 04)
- Re: 2010 IPv4 (and IPv6) Address Use Report Richard Barnes (Jan 04)
- Re: 2010 IPv4 (and IPv6) Address Use Report Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 04)
- Re: 2010 IPv4 (and IPv6) Address Use Report Richard Barnes (Jan 04)
- Re: 2010 IPv4 (and IPv6) Address Use Report Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 04)
- Re: 2010 IPv4 (and IPv6) Address Use Report Leo Vegoda (Jan 05)
- Re: 2010 IPv4 (and IPv6) Address Use Report Richard Barnes (Jan 04)