nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST IPv6 document
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:44:42 -0600
On 1/10/2011 5:04 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Unless my point-to-point links are originating packets to the outside world (they should not be, in general), then I should not expect any PMTU-D responses directed at them. As such, blocking even those packets TO my point-to-point interfaces should not be problematic.
Unless the router responds to traceroutes with it's loopback, I'd expect ping traffic to p2p addresses. I'd also expect to see customer traceroutes originating from the p2p address (useful in troubleshooting as it uses an address outside the customer's BGP addresses.
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: NIST IPv6 document, (continued)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Mark Smith (Jan 08)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document TJ (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document TJ (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Justin M. Streiner (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 07)
- Message not available
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Tim Chown (Jan 10)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 10)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 10)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joel Jaeggli (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Phil Regnauld (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Phil Regnauld (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Mark Smith (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Phil Regnauld (Jan 06)