Re: Ipv6 for the content provider

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

On Jan 26, 2011, at 11:10 AM, David Freedman wrote:

> > >
> > And if your servers behind the LB aren't prepared for it, you lose a LOT
> > of logging data, geolocation capabilities, and some other things if you
> > go that route.
> >
> > Owen
>
> I can't imagine an LB vendor who would sell a v6 to v4 vip solution who
> wouldn't provide a way to inject the v6 addr in to the request as an
> additional header? I suggest a naming-and-shaming is in order
Sure, but, if you're not prepared to parse, log, and deal with that header,
then, you lose, right?

Note I said "IF your servers behind the LB aren't prepared for it..."

Owen