nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links

From: Grzegorz Janoszka <Grzegorz () Janoszka pl>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:11:25 +0100

On 24-01-11 13:59, Carlos Friacas wrote:

Using /126s or /127s (or even /120s) is a result of going with the v4
mindset of conservation.


Not only, there are some other advantages of using /126's, like reducing
number of ND requests on the link and the size of neighbor tables.

-- 
Grzegorz Janoszka

Current thread:

IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Lasse Jarlskov (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Carlos Friacas (Jan 24)
  - Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Grzegorz Janoszka (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Marco Hogewoning (Jan 24)
  - Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links bmanning (Jan 24)
    - Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Jack Bates (Jan 24)
    - Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Crist Clark (Jan 24)
    - Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Owen DeLong (Jan 24)
    - Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Randy Bush (Jan 24)
    - Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Blake Hudson (Jan 31)
    - Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Randy Bush (Jan 31)
    - Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Blake Hudson (Jan 31)
    - Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Randy Bush (Jan 31)

(Thread continues...)