nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 addressing for core network
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:59:24 +0100
On 9 feb 2011, at 10:48, sthaug () nethelp no wrote:
The all zeros address is the all routers anycast address so on most non-Cisco routers you can't use it, ruling out /127. The top 128 addresses in any subnet are also reserved anycast addresses although they don't do much in practice. So the longest prefix length you should use is /120 and only use addresses 1 - 127.
A /127 mask is still the best way to handle real point-to-point links like SDH/SONET today, to avoid the ping-pong problem. Works fine with Cisco and Juniper, not tried with other vendors.
I know it's immature, but I can't wait for some new hire at vendor C or vendor J to reread the RFCs and implement the all routers anycast address according to spect and then see sparks fly. Like I said, global scope addresses on your router-to-router interfaces is such IPv4 thinking.
Current thread:
- Ipv6 addressing for Core network Vikas Sharma (Feb 08)
- RE: Ipv6 addressing for Core network George Bonser (Feb 08)
- Re: Ipv6 addressing for Core network Vikas Sharma (Feb 10)
- Re: Ipv6 addressing for Core network Jimmy Hess (Feb 08)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network sthaug (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network sthaug (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Mohacsi Janos (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network sthaug (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network sthaug (Feb 09)
- RE: Ipv6 addressing for Core network George Bonser (Feb 08)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Sam Stickland (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network sthaug (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network David Freedman (Feb 09)
- Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 09)
- Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network David Freedman (Feb 09)
- Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Owen DeLong (Feb 09)