Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN

[bmanning () vacation karoshi com]

On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:47:10PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <4D4CA1B1.5060002 () brightok net>, Jack Bates writes:
> > On 2/4/2011 6:45 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > > I used to work for CSIRO.  Their /16's which were got back in the
> > > late 80's will now be /48's.
> >
> > That's why I didn't try doing any adjustments of X is the new /32. The 
> > whole paradigm changes.
>
> So why the ~!#! are you insisting on comparing IPv4 allocations with IPv6
> alocations.

        "..96 more bits - no majik.."

> Mark

--bill